Proper 12 • Genesis 18:(17–19) 20–33 • July 25, 2010

By Dr. Jeffrey A. Gibbs

Introduction
The text presents two particular problems for interpreters. The first is the question of how “AD Christians” read the “BC Old Testament.” The second pertains to the whole issue of prayer in general, and intercessory prayer in particular. I will comment on the latter problem first.

It is dangerously easy to take “promises” regarding prayer out of context, even when they occur in direct discourse about the subject. James 1:6–8 is a prime example: “But let him ask in faith, with no doubting, for the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. For that person must not suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord; he is a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways.” In isolation these words drive to despair, for who can banish all doubt from his mind when he prays? But verse 5 actually sets the stage, and takes away most of the difficulty: “If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him.” This is a teaching about praying to God for wisdom; given the character of God, I do not doubt that he will answer this prayer. So, it will be extremely important to read the text that describes Abraham’s “negotiating prayer” in its Old Testament context, rather than assuming too quickly that this narrative teaches about prayer in general.

In answer to the first question, I would highlight the importance of reading the OT typologically. To be sure, there are times when OT figures are exemplars, and we may mutatis mutandis apply truths and lessons from their lives to our own; see Hebrews 11. Nevertheless, the fundamental “move” of reading OT texts locates them in the history of salvation, and sees them in light of the one who is the antitype and fulfillment of the entire OT. Samson, for example, is not “Joe Israelite” with whom each Christian today may identify. Rather, Samson is a deliverer of Israel, and a small (though deeply flawed) type for whom Jesus, deliverer par excellence, is the antitype.

Abraham’s uniqueness is everywhere in the context. He will be the father of many nations (17:5); with him God first makes the covenant of circumcision (17:9–14). God uniquely promises a son to him and aged Sarah (17:15–21). In a unique way, God visits Abraham, and repeats the promise (18:1–15). In the history of God’s ways in the world, Genesis 18 presents Abraham in his uniqueness as one whom, unworthy though he was, God had chosen and through whom God would work.

If this is the case, then a typological reading of this text, that finds ultimate fulfillment and meaning in Christ who is “greater than Abraham,” is appropriate for Christian preaching. The task, then, is to discern the nature of Abraham’s prayer, what it says about him and about the world and about God himself, and then to find a valid application in the person and work of Christ Jesus for us and for the world.

Textual Themes
Because of Abraham’s unique place in history, God makes known to him the plan to visit Sodom and Gomorrah, and to judge them in righteousness. Abraham pleads with God on behalf of the righteous in these two cities. Abraham’s prayer assumes that God loves the righteous, that is, those who trust his word and keep his covenant in response. While the wicked deserve to be punished, it would not be right for punishment to fall indiscriminately upon righteous and wicked.

Remarkably, however, there is room for Abraham to plead that God’s love and care for the righteous “overlap” graciously upon the wicked, so that for the sake of only fifty … no, forty five … indeed … only TEN righteous ones, God will hold back his judgment. Not only does Abraham believe firmly in the justice and mercy of the God; he also clings to the mystery of divine grace whereby the guilty do not always receive what is due them. God grants his prayer and promises that if ten righteous are found, then Sodom and Gomorrah will be spared.

So, then, the significant themes of the text have to do with Abraham’s knowledge of God’s character, and his desire to intercede for the righteous, and for God to do what is right. This is Abraham, who is God’s “friend” (2 Chr 20:7; Is 41:8; Jas 2:23) as one chosen for a crucial role in the history of God’s salvation in the world. His intercession is informed, and effective.

In typological terms, Christ is the unique chosen one of God, and his intercession flows out of his perfect knowledge of the Father. Even more, Christ alone makes the Father known to men and women (Mt 11:25–27). Even more than interceding for the righteous, Christ intercedes for all, though none deserve his intercession: Peter (Lk 22:31–34) as well as those who crucified him (Lk 23:34). The unbelief and wickedness of Sodom and Gomorrah serve as archetypes, but “all have sinned and fallen short of God’s glory” (Rom 3). Greater still is the intercession and work of Jesus on behalf of the world. God’s judgment fell upon him, so that it need not fall upon us.

This reading from Genesis 18 could lead the congregation into a renewed sense of the world’s and their own fallenness. Specific application should be made, and not just to matters of sexual temptation and sin; 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 reminds us that there is no distinction in God’s sight between homosexual (and heterosexual!) sin and things like greed or the practice of reviling others. Even as the sermon could call all alike to humble silence before the justice of God, so even more could the good news of Jesus, one “greater than Abraham,” turn all in faith and gratitude to Christ, his atonement, his resurrection, and his intercessor before the Father.

Related posts


Proper 29 • Luke 23:27–43 • November 20, 2016


Proper 29 • Luke 23:27–43 • November 20, 2016

By Mark A. Seifrid The drama of the text unfolds in three acts. The first act is the way of the cross with Jesus’s word to the women who followed him on the way. The second act is the crucifixion at the place called “Skull.” The third act is the mocking of Jesus. Yet amidst the mocking, there...


Proper 28 • Luke 21:5–28 • November 13, 2016


Proper 28 • Luke 21:5–28 • November 13, 2016

By David Adams The Text as Text The text of this account in Luke’s gospel is well-attested, and there is no variant that is so problematic as to demand serious consideration. In v. 19 the future tense κτησεσθε occurs in many manuscripts in place of the the eclectic text’s aorist κτήσασθε...


All Saints’ Day • Matthew 5:1–12 • November 6, 2016


All Saints’ Day • Matthew 5:1–12 • November 6, 2016

By Joel Elowsky Crowds are always following Jesus looking for something. These crowds come from everywhere, not just the locals, and they’re filled with expectation. He always takes their expectations and transforms them into something more significant than they perhaps knew they needed. His...

2 Comments

  1. Fraser Coltman July 19, 2016
    Reply

    Thank Dr. Gibbs for your excellent commentary on Genesis 18. I see the importance of the typological interpretation of the text, but I have a question. Given its liturgical context within Proper 12 that includes Luke 11 and Jesus’ teaching on prayer, is there not some place for allowing this text to speak both of our Lord’s intercession for salvation the world and our calling as His people to join Him in that call to prayer for a world still in need of intercession?

    • Jeff Gibbs July 19, 2016

      Dear Fraser,

      Thanks for your encouragement, and for your comment. I’m afraid I’ll come across now like an exegetical curmudgeon, but I guess I can’t help myself. The liturgical context should not be allowed to over-ride or twist or trump the meaning of a text. That is to say, lectionary committees do the best that they can in matching up lessons, but sometimes, it just doesn’t work. So, the most obvious problem with the connection with Luke 11 is that in Genesis, Abraham is not, in fact, interceding for Sodom and Gomorrah at all. He is interceding for the righteous who might possible be within the cities: “Will you indeed sweep away the righteous with the wicked?” Verse 25 is even stronger. You could get to our intercession for the world, I suppose, but only by first reading Gen 18 typologically, and ending up with the greater and more wonderful intercession of Christ for all.

      By the way, I noticed that I think is another example of this problem this last Sunday, with Gen 18:1-15 (in our bulletin, the lesson stopped arbitrarily at v.10 !) being paired with Luke 10:38-42. As far as I could tell (and I preached on Luke 10), the theme of “hospitality” must have been the common “thread” that bound them together. But in each text, that theme functions very, VERY differently, and it’s not clear at all to me that the lessons really belong together in that close proximity.

      Of course, last time I checked I was not the czar of all things homiletical or exegetical, so all must be offered and received with any number of grains of salt . . . .

      Blessings!

      Jeff

Leave a Reply