Martin Luther’s Stand at Worms, Uncut

Martin Luther’s Stand at Worms, Uncut

“FREEDOM!!” Thus roared the cobalt-faced, blue-eyed Braveheart that is Mel Gibson, neck straining both to bellow and to hold up a noggin that remarkably dwarfed the majestic highlands of Scotland. The real William Wallace was a relatively important figure in the 13th century Wars for Scottish Independence, but the image as a champion of the commoner and noble freedom fighter is largely the stuff of myth and movies.

Legends have swirled around Martin Luther as well. Luther’s contemporaries were struck by his epoch-making significance even while he was yet alive—friends believed he was a prophetic vessel of God; enemies feared him as an instrument of the devil. Generations later, Luther continued to stride across the pages of history—a giant in the German and European imagination. In particular, modernity wanted Luther to be one of their own—to be an enlightened modern, a harbinger of independence, autonomy, and freedom. And nothing was more emblematic of this than Luther’s defiant stance at the Diet of Worms in 1521. There, standing before the most powerful institutions in the world, the Holy Roman Empire and the Church—the emperor and the papacy, Luther declared that he could not act against his conscience and that he would not recant even if it meant his death: “Here I stand, I can do no other!” The moment has been immortalized in numerous paintings and movie scenes, with Luther—standing with Braveheart-like boldness—in the midst of the world’s potentates, a lone, triumphant individual.

It’s a powerful image but there are some problems with it. For almost a century, historians have known that it is highly unlikely that Luther ever said the words, “Here I stand,” in his speech at Worms (though I still love that Bob Kolb wears socks that have “Hier stehe ich” embroidered along their length). But more importantly, Luther’s moment before the emperor was not the triumphant declaration of individual freedom and autonomy. Luther did write about freedom, but it was the freedom of the conscience in the Gospel which liberated the heart from the tyranny of our sins and the fear of death. The duty and obligation to give up one’s own freedoms to serve one another in love was also part of the same message. But at Worms, Luther’s speech was not about freedom, but about captivity. “My conscience is captive to the Word of God,” he said, “I cannot and will not recant.… Deus adjuvet me—God help me.” This was not the speech of a freedom fighter, a defiant rebel who sought to cast off the shackles of every authority and institution. This was a speech of a monk—perhaps a very frightened monk—who nevertheless discovered that he had no choice but to cling to “the one thing needful,” the Word and promise of Jesus Christ. Maybe he got some things wrong in his writings. Maybe he said some things about others that he ought not to have. But in the end, he could not escape the Scriptures. He had been captured by the Word of God—only that would save him, only that would reform the church, only that could bring true freedom (John 8:36—“if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed”).

This weekend is the 500th anniversary of Luther’s speech at the Diet of Worms on April 18, 1521. In anticipation we have included the video below. Several years ago, I had the privilege of advising the PBS documentary Martin Luther: The Idea that Changed the World. The producers, Steve Boettcher and Mike Trinklein, have put together a “directors’ cut” of Luther’s speech and graciously gave us access to it. It includes a more complete version of his speech than what we normally hear (though even here it does not include everything), and I think the actor (Pádraic Delaney) captures well the mood and the import of the moment. Enjoy and feel free to share it and show it.

Related posts

Theological Symposium – Call for Papers

Theological Symposium - Call for Papers


Theological Symposium - Call for Papers

The Theological Symposium committee invites proposals for open sectionals for the 34th Annual Theological Symposium, September 17-18, 2024, at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis. The title this year is “Technology and the Church: Promise and Peril.” Major technological advances are not for...

Lutheran Theology: Direct the Passions

Lutheran Theology: Direct the Passions


Lutheran Theology: Direct the Passions

This is part five in a series of posts by Dr. David Maxwell. The first was “What Should You Do With Anger and Desire?” The second was “Gregory of Nyssa: Direct the Passions.” The third was “Cyril of Alexandria: Lull Your Passions to Sleep.” The fourth was "Lutheran Theology: Kill Your...

Lutheran Theology: Kill Your Passions

Lutheran Theology: Kill Your Passions


Lutheran Theology: Kill Your Passions

This is part four in a series of posts by Dr. David Maxwell. The first was "What Should You Do With Anger and Desire?" The second was "Gregory of Nyssa: Direct the Passions." The third was "Cyril of Alexandria: Lull Your Passions to Sleep." My sense is that Lutheran spirituality leans more in...

3 Comments

  1. Damian Snyder April 14, 2021
    Reply

    Thank you for your post. Can you give us more details about why historians believe it is unlikely Luther spoke the words “here I stand”?

    • Erik Herrmann April 14, 2021

      Damian, Thanks for reading and your question (hope all is well in Levenworth!) The main reason that historians doubt that Luther actually said these words is that they do not appear in any of the original records of the proceedings of the Diet, recorded by those in attendance. Rather, the phrase first appeared in a published version of the proceedings printed in Wittenberg later. Thus, they were probably added, giving the speech a bit more of a heroic touch at a time when Luther’s supporters were eager to lead a military rebellion against the emperor (e.g. the knights Ulrich von Hutten and Franz von Sickingen). They also don’t really match the tenor of the speech which carefully lays out his position and ends with a traditional Latin oath, Deus adjuvet me – God help me. As he left the room, he said, “I am finished!” (i.e. “I’m done for”). Luther’s final sentences would certainly have caused a stir among those in attendance but not because of a final defiant German phrase, but because he confessed that popes and councils had and do err. The anti-Romanists in the room were still largely supportive of church councils as a vehicle for reform. Any strategy that Luther’s princely supporters may have had to bring this matter to a German church council was thrown out the window at that moment. Whether he said it or not, Luther had taken his stand solely on the Word of God!

  2. Rev. Thomas Wenndt April 16, 2021
    Reply

    About 30 years ago, I was reading a rather scholarly account of the events at Worms. – I regret I cannot recall its source. But it stated something that made a lot of sense to me. The words “Here I Stand – I cannot do otherwise” were never recorded in the transcriptions of the events, because all the transcriptions were made in the official language of the H.R.E. – Latin. Luther made the entire speech in this video in the language of Latin. But those final words he added he spoke in German. It is believed that the words were spoken by Luther on behalf of his supporters. They were indeed heard and were real but were never entered into the official transcription – and it is even questioned whether the transcriber heard or even understood what he said, since he said it, apparently rather softly, in the language of German.. But I have never heard people challenge that those words never existed.

Leave a comment