Comparison/Contrast

Thematic StructuresOverview

This structure systematically explores relevant similarities and/or differences between two topics in order to accomplish a purpose for the hearer.  In this sermon, the purpose of comparing/contrasting is crucial.  While proverbial wisdom says that you cannot compare apples and oranges, the preacher responds that you most certainly can, depending upon what your purpose is.  The sermon, thus, does more than simply inform hearers of similarities and/or differences.  It uses that information for a purpose, and that purpose often makes a difference in their lives.  For example, one could compare/contrast the teaching in an adult bible class with the teaching in the Sunday sermon for the purpose of encouraging hearers to attend both worship and bible class.

In presenting this information to the hearers, the preacher has a choice of two approaches.  He can work whole-to-whole (i.e., offering all of the individual items of one topic before proceeding to a listing of the individual items of another topic:  A1, A2, A3 and B1, B2).  For example, the preacher may compare and contrast Mary and Martha or the Pharisee and the Publican.  Or the preacher can work part-to-part (i.e., offering one item from each topic and then proceeding to the next item:  A1/B1, A2/B2, A3/B3).  In part to part, a larger theme will be present for the hearers that slowly unfolds through the comparison.  For example, the preacher may articulate the theme of repentance by comparing and contrasting Peter and Judas or he may articulate the theme of preaching the kingdom of God by comparing and contrasting John the Baptizer and Jesus.

Whole-to-whole Part-to-part
  1. Topic A:
    • A1
    • A2
    • A3
    • A4
  2. Topic B:
    • B1
    • B2
    • B3
  1. Topic:
    • A1
    • B1
  2. Topic:
    • A2
    • B2
  3. Topic:
    • A3
    • B3

The choice of approach is often based upon the balance of information that you have and what you desire your hearers to remember.  Whole-to-whole encourages them to remember the topics (e.g., Mary and Martha); part-to-part encourages them to remember the items that compose the topics (e.g., the stages of temptation found in both the fall of Eve and the fall of David into sin).

Examples

Sermon by Dr. Charles Arand preached in Concordia Seminary’s Chapel April 27, 2010:[audio:http://deimos3.apple.com/WebObjects/Core.woa/FeedEnclosure/csl-public-dz.6769734418.06769734420.9013902750/enclosure.MP3]

Sermon by Dr. Jeffrey Kloha preached in Concordia Seminary’s Chapel January 24, 2013:
[audio:https://concordiatheology.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/1_Timothy_6_11-16.MP3]

© 2013 David Schmitt. All rights reserved.

Related posts

Lectionary at Lunch+


Lectionary at Lunch+

We are working to make our Lectionary @ Lunch resource a better tool for you. We’ll be back online soon with a refreshed look and better access to lectionary resources. Meanwhile, you can find homiletical helps on our site by clicking the magnifying glass to search. To search by the...

Privacy Policy


Privacy Policy

Thank you for visiting our website and for reviewing our Privacy Policy. In summary, our policy is: We collect no information about you, other than information automatically collected and stored (see below), when you visit our website or information that you choose to provide to...

Centers

Centers


Centers

  Concordia Seminary, St. Louis hosts a number of centers led by individual faculty members to provide theological leadership and expertise to Church and world. Center for the Care of Creation The Center for the Care of Creation seeks to articulate and promote a deep Christian...

Leave a comment