Curiouser and curiouser

Coinciding with — I almost said “echoing” — the release of Tim Burton’s new take on “Alice in Wonderland” is a different kind of journey down the rabbit hole. A strange episode is reported from the Florida-Bahamas Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) in which a congregation in Florida voted to leave the ELCA, and the synod council has now refused to allow them to withdraw from the denomination.

The congregation, St. Peter Lutheran Church in Fort Pierce, was originally founded by the Lutheran Church in America. As such, they followed an ELCA constitutional requirement that former LCA congregations must receive synodical approval to leave the denomination. The congregation disagreed with the ELCA’s 2009 churchwide assembly decisions regarding homosexuality, decisions which opened the door for “Lutherans in committed, publicly accountable, lifelong, monogamous same-gender relationships to serve as ELCA clergy,” and voted 20-0 to withdraw from the ELCA. And now the synod council has decided not to grant permission for such a separation.

The Florida-Bahamas synod council cited “missional” concerns as the reason for their decision, and members of the council remarked how much prayer had preceded the action. The ELCA news story about the matter reports that this is the first time since last year’s churchwide assembly that a congregation’s decision to leave the church body has been refused, although some congregations in New York have been “respectfully requested” to stay after moving in the same direction as the Florida congrgation.

The story is, of course, partly about the continuing fallout from the 2009 ELCA decisions, actions which have had and will have far-reaching consequences for the ELCA and for global Lutheranism. But at another level, this case is strange, because it spotlights the complexity and ambivalence in contemporary relationships between local congregations and their denominations. If you still supposed that congregations are simply local franchises of their denominational “brands,” this latest wrinkle in American Lutheran church life should give you cause to rethink. As Alica would say, “Curiouser and curiouser.”

Related posts

Kolb Festschrift Announced: From Wittenberg to the World

Kolb Festschrift Announced: From Wittenberg to the World


Kolb Festschrift Announced: From Wittenberg to the World

This summer was the 13th International Congress of Luther Research. The Congress is generally held every 5 years, and continues be the venue for the world’s most prolific and influential Luther scholars. This year was particularly special because it coincided with the 500th anniversary of...

Pondering Our Death

Pondering Our Death


Pondering Our Death

What do you do with the body?

Symposium Preview: Sectionals

Symposium Preview: Sectionals


Symposium Preview: Sectionals

A wide range of speakers exploring answers not only to "What does this mean?" but "How is this done?"

3 Comments

  1. Paul Robinson March 26, 2010
    Reply

    The story also spotlights the fact that the word “missional” continues to plod toward utter meaninglessness.

    • Will Schumacher April 9, 2010

      Yes, the verbal slippage bothered me, too. “Missional” was a made-up word anyway (dating back roughly to Darrell Guder’s book in 1998), and maybe neologisms are especially prone to being co-opted by faddish ideologies or simply drained of any discernable content. It has, alas, become hard to say anything at all.

    • Joe Burnham April 10, 2010

      Plod? Plodding was when people stripped the word of any element of sending to instead mean doing anything that hinted of outreach, you know, when it produced comments like, “Those congregations don’t have enough money to put on big events to attract the community so they can be missional” (never mind that attrahere and mittere are antonyms). We’ve moved from plodding to sprinting.

Leave a comment