The Gracious “Electric Chair” – Part 2

In my previous posting I discussed the matter of the cross and the general horror that it evokes. I would like to continue with a further observation. My focus this time is specifically on the appellation “holy cross,” as in the sentence used on the cover of the service folder for last Wednesday’s Holy Week worship service, viz., “We adore You, O Christ, and we praise You, because by Your holy Cross you have redeemed the world.”

In what sense is our Lord’s cross “holy”? Not literally, I would aver. It does not possess holiness in and of itself. Indeed, one would be hard pressed even to contend that it has been set aside for sacred use, what with all sorts of men handling it and there being no ritually-restricted use of it. No, the cross can be called “holy” because of who was on it and/or because of what happened upon it or was accomplished through it.

In other words, Christ’s cross can be called “holy” only by metonymy, i.e., because the referent of this adjective is associated with some closely connected referent. In this case, the quality of the cross referred to is associated with the quality of the one who was on it or with the quality of the activity of the one who was on it. But it is not holy in the literal meaning of the word.

Now, this distinction is important, because it helps to focus piety and to keep it from going far astray. Because the cross itself is not holy, it should not be an object of devotion or veneration. Pieces of it should not be sought out and made a “relic” for worship by the faithful. It does not have intrinsic value beyond that of other crosses used for execution. Rather, the cross is a reminder of what was accomplished upon its limbs and a reminder of the unspeakable and incomprehensible sacrifice which it enabled. Only with this proper understanding of the value of the cross will we be enabled to keep our eyes focused exactly where they should be, viz., upon Him, now risen, who redeemed us through its horror.

Related posts

REVIEW: REDEEMING TRANSCENDENCE IN THE ARTS, by Jeremy Begbie

REVIEW: REDEEMING TRANSCENDENCE IN THE ARTS, by Jeremy Begbie


REVIEW: REDEEMING TRANSCENDENCE IN THE ARTS, by Jeremy Begbie

Editor's note: this review originally appeared in the Winter 2020 issue of the Concordia Journal. We reprint it here in anticipation of this year's Theological Symposium, "Whatever is Lovely": The Role of Beauty in Theology and Ministry, September 21-22, 2021. For more information and to...

Christ Centered Counseling … and Justification

Christ Centered Counseling ... and Justification


Christ Centered Counseling ... and Justification

Rick Marrs talks with David Loy about the connections between Christian counseling, justification, and the distinction between law and gospel.

How Lutheran Hymns Lost Their Monopoly in the Missouri Synod

How Lutheran Hymns Lost Their Monopoly in the Missouri Synod


How Lutheran Hymns Lost Their Monopoly in the Missouri Synod

An opinion piece by Paul Raabe on what happened to traditional hymns in American Christianity.

1 Comment

  1. BibleAtRandom on Facebook April 16, 2012
    Reply

    A further discussion may address why the cross is perceived as an object of decorative (as opposed to evocative) art, rendered beautiful by crafts-people in an effort to make it suitable not just as jewelry, but as home-decor, etc., and whether such a treatment evokes the image we are meant to be reminded of when we see it.

Leave a comment