Related posts

Meet the Professor: Dr. Jon Vieker

Meet the Professor: Dr. Jon Vieker


Meet the Professor: Dr. Jon Vieker

Concordia Seminary President Dr. Thomas J. Egger sits down with Dr. Jon Vieker, who became associate professor of Practical Theology in August 2021. He also serves as dean of chapel. Vieker previously served as senior assistant to Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) President Dr. Matthew...

Meet the Professor: Dr. Ely Prieto

Meet the Professor: Dr. Ely Prieto


Meet the Professor: Dr. Ely Prieto

  Concordia Seminary President Dr. Thomas J. Egger sits down with Dr. Ely Prieto, who became associate professor of Practical Theology in July 2021. He also serves as the Lutheran Foundation Professor of Urban and Cross-Cultural Ministry, and associate dean for Urban and Cross-Cultural...

Conversations in Preaching: Dr. Dean Nadasdy

Conversations in Preaching: Dr. Dean Nadasdy


Conversations in Preaching: Dr. Dean Nadasdy

Dr. David Schmitt, the Gregg H. Benidt Memorial Professor of Homiletics and Literature at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, chats with Lutheran theology scholar Dr. Dean Nadasdy about his recent publication of The Beautiful Sermon: Image and the Aesthetics of Preaching. The book is the first...

2 Comments

  1. Kyle February 14, 2018
    Reply

    David does a great job! I think this is very helpful!

  2. Rick Strickert February 16, 2018
    Reply

    The enthusiasm for the “verbal performance of Scripture” appears in a 2013 book, Bring the Word to Life: Engaging the New Testament through Performing It, by Richard F. Ward and David J. Trobisch (Wm B. Eerdmans, 110 pages).

    Referring to a Christmas party in which Luke’s story of Jesus’ birth was read by United Theological Seminary professor Thomas Boomershine, Richard Ward writes:

    The manner of his presentation was also intriguing. It was similar to other modes of performance I was familiar with but didn’t quite conform to any one of them. It resembled theatre because Tom treated the biblical text like a “script” and spoke it as if he were “acting” the part of the biblical narrator. Yet he wasn’t “in character” — he wasn’t impersonating a character developed by a playwright. The presentation had the spontaniet of storytelling, but the teller of the story was sticking closely to the words of a text that he himself had not created. It was more like an oral interpretation of a text, except he had internalized the actual text — it was not something that he held in his hands or referred to on a lectern….

    One of the things that biblical studies awakens is an interest in “origins,” as in “Where did this text come from?” Performing a text awakens an interest in origins too — “How was a text like this done?” “How was it ‘performed’?” And then, “How shall I perform it now?” Asking these questions together brings about a vital collaboration between performance studies and biblical interpretation through the practice of performing literature. Performance study of biblical texts yields new, imaginative ways to experience them and to present the interpreter’s understanding of both the texts and the narrative worlds they come from. [pp. ix-x]

Leave a comment