World War I, the Supreme Court, and a cross in the Mojave desert: what does this mean?

So, I’ll pick up a hot potato: In what seems like it is becoming a typical 5-to-4 decision last week , the Supreme Court decided in Salazar v. Buono that the World War I memorial—or more precisely, the cross that is part of the memorial—that stands in the Mojave National Preserve is not unconstitutional and does not advance a particular religion. To be precise, the cross no longer sits on public land but on land owned by the VFW, but that’s all part of the particulars of the case

Link:
World War I, the Supreme Court, and a cross in the Mojave desert: what does this mean?

Related posts

Looking for shalom after Baton Rouge, St. Paul, and Dallas

Looking for shalom after Baton Rouge, St. Paul, and Dallas


Looking for shalom after Baton Rouge, St. Paul, and Dallas

          Go here to read the original: Looking for shalom after Baton Rouge, St. Paul, and Dallas


The un-countable life: waiting for an Advent in Ferguson


The un-countable life: waiting for an Advent in Ferguson

Go here to see the original: The un-countable life: waiting for an Advent in Ferguson

Pro Re Theologica et Salute Fratrum: Luther as Reformer of Pastoral Care

Pro Re Theologica et Salute Fratrum: Luther as Reformer of Pastoral Care


Pro Re Theologica et Salute Fratrum: Luther as Reformer of Pastoral Care

Another Reformation Day has come and gone. Each year the day gives us occasion to reflect on the significance of the upheavals of the Sixteenth Century—upheavals that changed the religious, social, and cultural landscape of the West, especially the western church. What was at stake? What was it...

Leave a Reply