It’s Almost Easter . . . Time For Another “Jesus Tomb” “Discovery”

Larry Hurtado, one of the world’s foremost scholars of early Christianity (and whose blog should be in your feed), draws attention to, as he puts it, “This year’s hoo-ha“: James Tabor and Simcha Jacobovici are releasing a book and (natürlich) a Discovery Channel special in which they claim to have discovered the earliest Christian tomb, dated before the destruction of the Jerusalem in AD 70. If these two names are familiar, it is because this is the same team who released a book and TV show several years back claiming to have discovered the “Jesus Family Tomb,” with ossuaries (bone boxes) containing remains of Jesus, his wife(!), Mary Magdelene, and their son(!), Judah. This “proposal” has met with universal rejection by scholars of all stripes.

But, there are books to write and TV specials to produce at Easter time, so here is a press release that lays out the newest claims. Go ahead and read the connect-the-dots argument (last year it was lead codices, remember?). But then read a sober analysis by Prof. Christopher Rollston.

I’ll let you work through the details, but essentially what Tabor and Jacobovici read as an inscription that mentions “God” and “resurrect” actually says neither “God” nor “resurrect.” And some engravings that they take to be a depiction of Jonah and the great fish are simply depictions of tomb entrances. As Rollston points out, even if these are vague references on these ossuaries to some kind of afterlife, we already knew that some strains of first-century Judaism had a belief in after-life existence. Far from being a sensational find with no historical support, these items fit with what we already knew about burial beliefs and practices in Jerusalem in the first century.

But that doesn’t sell books or TV shows.

Oh, and I forgot to mention that Mary Magdalene is referred to as “Lord” in their reading of an inscription. Will The Davinci Code ever go away?

 

 

Related posts

Book Blurbs: James W. Voelz, Principles of Biblical Interpretation for Everyone

Book Blurbs: James W. Voelz, Principles of Biblical Interpretation for Everyone


Book Blurbs: James W. Voelz, Principles of Biblical Interpretation for Everyone

Concordia Seminary’s Dean of Theological Research and Publication Dr. Kevin Golden talks with Graduate Professor of Exegetical Theology Dr. James W. Voelz about his recent book, Principles of Biblical Interpretation for Everyone (Concordia Seminary Press, 2023), in this Concordia Journal Book...

Book Blurbs: James Brauer, Music: God’s Mysterious Gift

Book Blurbs: James Brauer, Music: God’s Mysterious Gift


Book Blurbs: James Brauer, Music: God’s Mysterious Gift

Concordia Seminary’s Dean of Theological Research and Publication Dr. Kevin Golden sits down with Professor Emeritus Dr. James Brauer about his recent book, Music: God’s Mysterious Gift (Wipf and Stock, 2023), in this Concordia Journal Book Blurbs segment. Brauer says he wrote the book for...

Third Sunday in Lent

Third Sunday in Lent


Third Sunday in Lent

Spark your thoughts for March 3, 2024! Tune in to "Lectionary Kick-start" for a discussion about the texts for the third Sunday in Lent.

1 Comment

  1. Jim Driskell March 1, 2012
    Reply

    Well of course we need the Gospels of Thomas and Judas, because they present the real truth and they’ve been shamefully repressed by those male-clergy churches. Still can’t figure out who Judas “wrote” the Gospel of Judas if he committed suicide, but hey there’s just got to be something there.
    Seriously it seems like anything is legitimate to believe in so long as it isn’t believing in Jesus, uhhmmm, who could have inspired that? Well there are the demons who “believe” but tremble. Could it be that so long as we are into the latest “truth” it is enough to keep us from “The Way, The Truth and The Life”?

Leave a comment